Problem

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Visa/Mastercard fees. Supplier ships goods before receiving payment. Retailer receives goods, deducts penalties from amount owed, and sends a reduced payment. Supplier disputes chargeback, but deducted funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days. Supplier must keep shipping on credit with less working capital for payroll, inventory, and operations. If supplier proves compliance, funds are returned, but doom loop repeats with each new shipment.

SOLUTION

Stablecoin for Cargill. XFT escrow facilities. Automated execution of chargeback payment flows. Instant zero-fee 24/7/365 global payments.

WORK

Supplier ships goods before receiving payment. Retailer receives goods, deducts penalties from amount owed, and sends a reduced payment. Supplier disputes the chargeback, but deducted funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days. During the dispute, the supplier must keep shipping on credit with less working capital for payroll, inventory, and operations. If supplier can prove compliance, the funds are returned, but the cycle repeats with each new shipment.

Supplier ships goods before receiving payment. Retailer receives goods, deducts penalties from amount owed, and sends a reduced payment. Supplier disputes chargeback, but deducted funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days. Supplier must keep shipping on credit with less working capital for payroll, inventory, and operations. If supplier can prove compliance, funds are returned, but cycle repeats with each new shipment.

Supplier ships goods before receiving payment. Retailer receives goods and deducts penalties from amount owed. Retailer sends reduced payment to supplier. Supplier disputes chargeback. Funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days.

Supplier ships goods before receiving payment. Retailer receives goods, deducts penalties from amount owed, and sends reduced payment to supplier.

Supplier disputes chargeback but working capital is frozen with retailer for 90+ days or until proven compliant.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Retailer sends reduced payment to supplier. Supplier disputes deduction but funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days.

but must continue shipping on credit, payroll, inventory.

Idle funds stay frozen with retailer for 90+ days. Less working capital for supplier to pay

Supplier must continue shipping

Supplier continues shipping on credit during dispute.

If dispute wins, deducted funds eventually return. Process repeats with each shipment.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Food suppliers ship goods on credit without prepayment. Retailers automatically deduct penalties before sending payment, creating a double cash flow hit. The supplier is presumed guilty and must prove compliance just to recover their own funds. Walmart may deduct $3,000 instantly, while Cargill waits over 90 days to dispute and retrieve the money. During this time, the deducted amount is frozen and unavailable for payroll, inventory, or operations. The supplier must keep shipping on credit while past deductions remain unresolved. This cycle traps working capital and weakens liquidity at every step.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Suppliers ship goods on credit. Retailers auto-deduct penalties before paying, creating an immediate cash shortfall. Walmart may deduct $3,000 instantly, while Cargill must wait 90+ days to dispute and recover the funds. During this period, the money is frozen and unavailable for payroll, inventory, or operations. The supplier must prove compliance to unlock withheld payments while continuing to ship on credit. This cycle traps working capital and strains liquidity with every transaction.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Suppliers ship goods on credit without prepayment. Retailers deduct penalties automatically before sending payment, creating a double cash flow hit that locks up working capital. Walmart can deduct $3,000 immediately, while Cargill is forced to wait over 90 days to dispute and recover the funds. During this period, the deducted money is frozen and cannot be used for payroll, inventory, or operations. The supplier must prove compliance just to recover its own funds, all while continuing to ship goods on credit. The result is a working capital trap that weakens liquidity and adds friction to every transaction.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

When companies sell products to big stores like Walmart, they ship the products first and get paid later. The stores take money away from what they owe if they think something went wrong with the shipment. The supplier company loses money twice because they already sent products without getting paid and now the store is keeping even more of their money.

The store takes the money right away but the supplier has to fight for months to get it back. While the supplier waits and argues about the money, they cannot use those funds to pay their workers or buy more supplies. The supplier has to prove they did everything correctly just to get their own money returned. Meanwhile they have to keep sending more products to the store without getting paid first. This creates a terrible cycle where suppliers never have enough cash available even though they are owed money.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Retail chargebacks create a severe working capital problem for suppliers who ship goods on credit to large retailers. When retailers believe a shipment error occurred, they automatically deduct penalties from payments before sending them to the supplier. This creates an immediate double hit where the supplier has already delivered products without receiving payment and now faces additional deductions from what they are owed. The deducted funds remain frozen while the supplier goes through a dispute process that typically takes over 90 days. During this extended period, the supplier cannot access that money for essential operations like payroll or purchasing inventory. The supplier must prove full compliance just to recover funds that were already rightfully theirs. The situation becomes a trap because suppliers must continue shipping additional products on credit terms even while fighting to recover previous deductions. This cycle severely constrains liquidity and turns every transaction into a potential drain on working capital.

THE RETAIL CHARGEBACK PROBLEM

Suppliers ship goods on credit without prepayment. Retailers auto-deduct penalties from payment owed before sending funds to supplier. This creates double cash flow hit doom loop.

Guilty until proven innocent. Walmart deducts $3,000 immediately. Cargill must dispute 90+ days to recover funds.

Cash flow reduction and working capital trap. Cargill cannot use deducted funds for payroll, inventory, or operations during dispute period. Money sits frozen with retailer.

Supplier forced to prove compliance to recover their own money. Must continue shipping on credit while fighting to get deducted funds back.

Supplier ships goods on credit. Chargebacks are taken by retailer before sending payment to supplier. Idle working capital. Cash flow reduction. Can't use deducted funds for payroll, inventory, or operations during dispute period. Supplier forced to prove compliance to recover their own money.

Cargill must dispute to get it back 90+ days later.

Retailers deduct penalty before sending payment to supplier. Idle working capital.

Supplier ships goods on credit. Idle working capital. Retailers auto-deducts penalties from payment owed

No prepayment

Supplier ships good on "credit" or before receiving payment.

Guilty until proven innocent

Walmart takes $3,000 immediately, Cargill must dispute to get it back 90+ days later.

Cash flow reduction

Cargill can't use deducted funds for payroll, inventory, or operations during dispute period. Money sits frozen with retailer.

Working capital trap: Cargill can't use deducted funds for payroll, inventory, or operations during dispute period. Money sits frozen with retailer.

Suppliers are all too familiar with chargebacks. There are many reasons they might occur, such as not submitting the appropriate EDI transactions, sending the shipment behind schedule, not meeting packing specifications, and not correctly labeling a carton.

With a chargeback, the next payment made to the vendor is reduced. It could go down a flat amount or a certain amount per order, shipment, or box.

This problem is not going away. A 2018 survey from Supply Chain Digest found that 58% of vendors and 43% of retailers believed chargebacks would increase over the next five years. Just 21% of each group thought chargebacks would reduce over that period.

Since chargebacks are so common from retailers, it is critical for suppliers to consider how to minimize them. This article looks at methods to prevent chargebacks from occurring and how to fight them when they do happen.

RESOURCES

https://www.daserv.com/how-to-prevent-and-fight-retailer-chargebacks/

Last updated 7 months ago